• Disappointing May factory orders in the United States fall short of expectations, pointing to potential challenges in the manufacturing sector. • Eagerly anticipated, the Federal Reserve minutes are set to be unveiled at 2:00 p.m. ET, capturing the attention of market participants keen on gaining insights into the central bank's deliberations. • Across the board, the indexes experience a mild downturn, with the Dow declining by 0.16%, the S&amp;P dipping by 0.05%, and the Nasdaq showing a marginal retreat of 0.07%. • Moderna's soaring ascent fueled by a groundbreaking partnership to spearhead the development of mRNA medicines in the vast landscape of China. • The ripple effect of China's stringent export curbs reverberates through the chip stocks market, triggering a downward slide and unsettling investors. On 5 July: Wall Street's primary indices experienced a decline on Wednesday, anticipating the release of the Federal Reserve's June meeting minutes. Investor sentiment was dampened by weak economic data from the United States and China, along with escalating tensions between the two nations. As per the Commerce Department's report, U.S. factory orders rose below the expected level in May, fueling concerns about a potential slowdown resulting from high-interest rates. The manufacturing sector showed a further decline last month. Investors are mainly focused on the Federal Reserve's minutes, which are set to be released around 2 p.m. ET. They are seeking hints regarding the central bank's monetary policy direction. More economic data, including the non-farm payrolls, is scheduled for release later this week, which could influence the trajectory of the Fed's interest rates. According to CME's Fedwatch tool, the probability of a 25-basis-point rate increase in July stands at 88.7%. However, traders have priced in only a 17.7% chance of another hike in September. Quincy Krosby, chief global strategist for LPL Financial, remarked that Federal Open Market Committee Chair Powell has acknowledged the existence of a disagreement within the Fed between the more dovish and the more hawkish factions. Given their consistent campaign of raising rates, this raises the question of why they chose to skip rate hikes during the June meeting. Shares of chip companies Intel (INTC.O) and Micron Technology (MU.O) each declined by 2% after China announced export controls on certain metals widely used in the semiconductor industry. This move adds to the escalating tensions surrounding access to high-tech microchips between Beijing and Washington. The Philadelphia SE Semiconductor Index (.SOX) experienced a decline of 1.4%. Wall Street had a modest start to the new quarter in a shortened session on Monday, following a significant AI-driven rally in the first half of the year. Tesla (TSLA.O) led the gains after the electric-vehicle company reported record second-quarter deliveries. As of 11:46 a.m. ET, the Dow Jones Industrial Average (.DJI) was down 56.47 points, or 0.16%, at 34,362.00. The S&amp;P 500 (.SPX) showed a decrease of 2.44 points, or 0.05%, at 4,453.15, while the Nasdaq Composite (.IXIC) recorded a decline of 9.20 points, or 0.07%, at 13,807.58. By mid-day, eight out of the 11 major sectors of the S&amp;P 500 were experiencing declines. Material shares (.SPLRCM) faced the most significant losses, down by 2.0%. Meta Platforms (META.O) showed a rise of 3.4%, outperforming other mega-cap tech and growth companies, as the launch of its Twitter-rival app, Threads, is expected on Thursday. Danni Hewson, head of financial analysis at AJ Bell, commented that investors are anticipating the potential of Meta's app to be a "Twitter-Killer." United Parcel Service (UPS.N) experienced a decline of 1.5% following accusations between the Teamsters Union and the postal service operator about each other's departure from contract negotiations. Moderna (MRNA.O) rose by 3% after the pharmaceutical company signed an agreement to explore research, development, and manufacturing opportunities for mRNA medicines in China. General Motors (GM.N) gained 1.1% after reporting positive second-quarter U.S. auto sales. The easing of supply chain pressures contributed to the company's performance. On the NYSE, declining issues outnumbered advancers with a ratio of 1.64-to-1, while on the Nasdaq, the ratio was 1.74-to-1. The S&amp;P index recorded 14 new 52-week highs and one new low, while the Nasdaq recorded 37 new highs and 45 new lows.

adam-nowakowski-MFms-wkv3Ow-unsplash (1).jpg

Wall Street's main indexes experienced a decline ahead of the Federal Reserve's June meeting minutes. Investor sentiment was impacted by weak economic data from both the U.S. and China, along with rising tensions between the two nations.

The Fear Factor: Why Wall Street is Nervous Before Fed Minutes

Unveiling the Tension: Wall Street's Dive as Fed Minutes Approach

Political economy is a field of study that examines the relationship between politics and economics, focusing on how political institutions and policies shape economic outcomes. It encompasses various approaches and theories that seek to understand the interactions between power, governance, and economic systems. In this article, we will provide an introductory overview of political economy, exploring its key concepts, historical development, and contemporary relevance.

**Understanding Political Economy**

Political economy examines the distribution and utilization of resources within a society, considering both the political and economic forces at play. It analyzes how political decisions, institutions, and ideologies influence economic policies, resource allocation, and wealth distribution. By studying political economy, we gain insights into the complex dynamics that shape economic systems and their impact on society.

**Historical Development**

The origins of political economy can be traced back to ancient civilizations, with thinkers like Plato and Aristotle contemplating the relationship between politics and economics. However, the modern discipline of political economy emerged during the Enlightenment period in the 18th century. Scholars such as Adam Smith, David Ricardo, and Karl Marx laid the foundation for understanding the interplay between economic processes and political structures.

Adam Smith, often regarded as the father of modern economics, introduced the concept of the invisible hand and argued for the importance of free markets and limited government intervention. His seminal work, "The Wealth of Nations," explored the benefits of market competition and division of labor in promoting economic growth.

David Ricardo expanded on Smith's ideas, developing the theory of comparative advantage, which emphasizes the benefits of international trade based on differences in opportunity costs. Ricardo's work provided insights into the gains from specialization and trade, shaping economic policies to this day.

In the 19th century, Karl Marx critiqued capitalist systems and developed a socio-political framework known as Marxism. Marx emphasized the role of class struggle and the exploitation of labor within capitalist economies. His analysis of the relationship between economic structures, power dynamics, and social inequality laid the groundwork for critical approaches within political economy.

**Key Concepts in Political Economy**

To grasp the core ideas within political economy, it is essential to familiarize ourselves with key concepts:

**1. Power and Institutions**

Political economy acknowledges the role of power and institutions in shaping economic outcomes. Political power, whether held by governments, corporations, or other entities, influences decision-making processes that impact resource allocation, regulations, and market structures. Institutions, such as legal frameworks, property rights, and governance structures, shape the rules of economic engagement and influence economic behavior.

**2. Distribution of Resources**

The distribution of resources and wealth is a central concern in political economy. It explores how economic systems and policies affect the allocation of resources among different social groups and the resulting income and wealth disparities. Understanding patterns of inequality and their drivers is crucial in assessing the fairness and sustainability of economic systems.

**3. Economic Policies and Ideologies**

Political economy examines the formulation and implementation of economic policies, considering how political ideologies and interests shape policy choices. Different economic ideologies, such as liberalism, socialism, or conservatism, have distinct perspectives on the role of the state, market regulation, and social welfare. Political economy evaluates the consequences of these ideologies and their impact on economic performance and societal well-being.

**4. Global Political Economy**

The global political economy explores the interactions between national economies in an interconnected world. It investigates the role of international institutions, trade agreements, multinational corporations, and global financial systems in shaping economic outcomes at the global level. Understanding global political economy is vital for comprehending the dynamics of international trade, development, and economic interdependence.

**Contemporary Relevance**

Political economy remains highly relevant in understanding contemporary economic and political challenges. It sheds light on issues such as income inequality, globalization, financial crises, environmental sustainability, and the role of technology in shaping economic systems. Political economy offers critical perspectives on policy debates and helps policymakers navigate the complexities of an ever-changing global landscape.

In addition, political economy provides a framework for analyzing the power dynamics and interests that shape economic decision-making. By examining the intersection of politics and economics, we can better understand how policies are formulated, implemented, and their implications for different societal groups.

**Conclusion**

Political economy provides a comprehensive framework for understanding the complex relationship between politics and economics. By exploring the interplay of power, institutions, ideologies, and economic policies, political economy offers valuable insights into the dynamics of resource allocation, wealth distribution, and economic outcomes. It continues to be a relevant and influential field of study, providing a deeper understanding of contemporary economic challenges and guiding policy discussions in an interconnected world.


Political economy is a field of study that examines the relationship between politics and economics, focusing on how political institutions and policies shape economic outcomes. It encompasses various...

Intro to Political Economy

The Treasury's Bureau of Fiscal Management revealed plans to auction $119 billion worth of 3-month and 6-month bills on Tuesday, with the settlement of the sales scheduled for June 1st, two days after the auction. This particular date has been highlighted by Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen as a potential deadline for the government to face a shortage of funds to cover its obligations. However, the condition for this scenario is the absence of a deal between the White House and congressional Republicans to raise the $31.4 billion debt ceiling.

Typically, the bureau would not announce an upcoming sale "until it is certain that it has room under the debt ceiling for the new securities," according to research firm Wrightson ICAP.

Gennadiy Goldberg, a senior rates strategist at TD Securities in New York, noted that the fact that the Treasury proceeded with the announcement suggests that they have the necessary cash to settle the security. He views this as a positive sign, as the Treasury has previously stated that it would not announce auctions if it did not have the means to settle them. However, Goldberg cautions that this positivity is limited, as it is highly likely that the Treasury will run out of cash in the first two weeks of June.

Despite Yellen's earlier comments indicating a possible X-date as early as June 1st, most Wall Street firms estimate that the Treasury will exhaust its borrowing capacity between June 6th and June 9th. Currently, the government's cash balance stands at $68.34 billion as of Monday, showing a slight increase from $60.66 billion on Friday but a decrease from $87.43 billion a week earlier.

Of significance, June 1st marks the maturity date for approximately $117 billion worth of T-bills. The uncertainty surrounding the X-date has led to high volatility in the market, with the yield on that issue soaring to a record high above 7% on Wednesday. However, it declined on Thursday following the Treasury's auction announcement for bills settling on June 1st, alongside signs of progress in the debt ceiling negotiations. The yield currently stands at 5.89%.

Considering the urgency of the situation, talks between the Biden administration and Republicans in the US House of Representatives have reportedly made progress. A potential deal is taking shape, with the two sides differing by only $70 billion on a total figure that would exceed $1 trillion, according to a source cited by Reuters.


The Treasury's Bureau of Fiscal Management revealed plans to auction $119 billion worth of 3-month and 6-month bills on Tuesday, with the settlement of the sales scheduled for June 1st, two days after...

The recent announcement by the US Treasury regarding its debt signals that June 1st may not be the critical "X-date" as previously anticipated

Here are some potential effects:

Inflation: As oil is a crucial input for most economic activities, an increase in its price can lead to higher production costs, which can result in inflationary pressures on consumer prices.

Reduced consumer spending: As fuel prices rise, consumers may have less disposable income to spend on other goods and services, leading to a reduction in overall consumer spending. This can have a negative impact on economic growth.

Impact on trade balances: Countries that are net oil importers may experience a deterioration in their trade balances as they spend more on oil imports. Conversely, oil-exporting nations may benefit from higher prices, leading to improved trade balances and increased government revenues.

Impact on stock markets: The stock prices of companies that are highly dependent on oil, such as airlines and transportation companies, may fall as their costs increase. Conversely, the stock prices of energy companies may rise as they benefit from higher prices.

Impact on government finances: Higher oil prices can lead to increased tax revenues for governments that tax oil production or consumption. However, if prices rise too high, it can also lead to increased social spending and subsidies to help mitigate the impact on consumers.

Overall, rising oil prices can have a significant impact on the global economy, and the extent of this impact will depend on various factors such as the magnitude and duration of the price increase, as well as the economic policies and responses of different countries.

Here are some potential effects:

Inflation: As oil is a crucial input for most economic activities, an increase in its price can lead to higher production costs, which can result in inflationary pres...

Rising oil prices can have various impacts on the global economy.

In recent years, many giant companies such as Google, Amazon, Facebook, and Microsoft have been in the headlines for laying off employees. These layoffs have come as a shock to many people, as these companies are often seen as stable and prosperous organizations that offer their employees job security and great benefits. So why are these companies laying off employees? In this article, we will take a closer look at some of the reasons why giant companies are laying off employees and what this means for the workforce as a whole.

**1-	Changing Market Conditions**

One of the main reasons why giant companies are laying off employees is due to changing market conditions. In today's fast-paced business world, companies must continually adapt to stay ahead of the competition. This means that sometimes companies need to make tough decisions, such as laying off employees, to cut costs and remain competitive.

For example, in the case of Google, the company laid off around 1,200 employees in early 2020 due to a decline in advertising revenue caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Similarly, Amazon laid off hundreds of employees in 2018 as it shifted its focus from its retail business to its cloud computing division.

**2-	Automation and Technology**

Another reason why giant companies are laying off employees is due to the increasing use of automation and technology. As technology continues to advance, many companies are finding that they can replace human workers with machines and algorithms that can perform the same tasks more efficiently and at a lower cost.
For example, in 2019, Amazon announced that it was planning to spend $700 million to retrain one-third of its workforce to perform more technical jobs, such as software engineering and data analytics. This move was seen as a way for Amazon to stay ahead of the curve and to ensure that its workforce was equipped with the skills needed to succeed in the age of automation.

**3-	Restructuring and Reorganization**

Another reason why giant companies are laying off employees is due to restructuring and reorganization. As companies grow and evolve, they often need to restructure their operations to remain competitive and efficient. This can involve consolidating departments, eliminating redundant positions, and shifting job responsibilities.
For example, in 2017, Microsoft announced that it was laying off thousands of employees as part of a major restructuring effort aimed at streamlining its operations and focusing on its cloud computing business. Similarly, Facebook has undergone several reorganizations in recent years, which have led to layoffs in certain departments.

**4-	Economic Downturns**

Finally, giant companies may lay off employees during economic downturns. When the economy takes a downturn, companies may experience a decline in sales or revenue, which can lead to budget cuts and layoffs.
For example, during the 2008 financial crisis, many companies were forced to lay off employees as they struggled to stay afloat. In the case of Google, the company laid off around 100 recruiters in 2008 due to a decline in hiring caused by the economic downturn.

**5-	Merger and Acquisition**

Another reason why giant companies lay off employees is due to the merger and acquisition of other companies. In many cases, when a company acquires another company, there is often a duplication of roles or responsibilities, and this can lead to layoffs.

For example, in 2016, Microsoft acquired LinkedIn, a professional networking platform. As part of the acquisition, Microsoft announced that it would be laying off around 5,500 employees to eliminate overlapping roles and to streamline operations.

**6-	Cost-cutting Measures**

Sometimes, giant companies lay off employees as a cost-cutting measure. When a company is looking to cut costs, it may turn to layoffs as a way to reduce expenses and to improve profitability.
For example, in 2019, Uber laid off around 1,200 employees as part of a cost-cutting measure aimed at improving its financial performance. Similarly, in 2014, IBM announced that it would be laying off around 15,000 employees as part of a cost-cutting initiative.

**7-	Strategic Shifts**

Finally, giant companies may lay off employees as part of a strategic shift in their business model or focus. As companies evolve and change, they may need to shift their focus to new products or services, which can require a different set of skills or expertise.

For example, in 2019, Intel announced that it was planning to lay off around 12,000 employees as part of a strategic shift away from its traditional business of manufacturing computer chips and towards new areas such as data centers and the Internet of Things.

**Conclusion**

In conclusion, there are many reasons why giant companies lay off employees, and these reasons can vary depending on the company and the industry in which it operates. While layoffs can be painful for employees and their families, they are often necessary for companies to remain competitive and to adapt to changing market conditions, technological advances, and shifts in the economy.

As the workforce continues to evolve, it is important for employees to stay adaptable and to develop new skills that will help them succeed in the age of automation and technology. It is also important for companies to be transparent and to communicate openly with their employees about any changes or challenges that may arise.
In summary, while layoffs can be difficult and disruptive, they are often a necessary part of the business world, and companies must take steps to ensure that they are managing them in a responsible and ethical manner.


In recent years, many giant companies such as Google, Amazon, Facebook, and Microsoft have been in the headlines for laying off employees. These layoffs have come as a shock to many people, as these c...

Newest & Recent

Find the lastest update

Popular of the day

Most watched posts

Forex Glossary

A to Z Forex abbreviations

Daily Analysis

Industry Experts posts

Pinned Tags

#trade360

#finexo

#fxtrading.com

#sky alliance markets

#amega

#ospreyfx

#fxglory

#fibo group

#ig global

#bdswiss

#lcg

#fxgrow

#legacyfx

#superforex

#simplefx

#rakuten securities

#ifc markets

#triumphfx

#world forex

#amana capital

economic downturns

5 articles published related to#economic downturns

Unveiling the Tension: Wall Street's Dive as Fed Minutes App...

Intro to Political Economy

The recent announcement by the US Treasury regarding its deb...

Rising oil prices can have various impacts on the global eco...

Why Are Giant Companies Laying Off Employees?

Daily Analysis

Geo Politics