<h2>Key Highlights</h2> <ul><li>The big oil firms, Exxon and Chevron, are expected to post substantial losses in profits due to lower gas, oil, and Petrochemical margins.</li><li>The petrochemicals industry, previously a security net for these businesses and their employees, is now experiencing a slump due to a shortage and low consumer demand. Some analysts claim it's the "Lehman 2" moment for the sector.</li><li>Big Oil companies invest in "New Energy" technologies as traditional revenue streams fail.</li></ul> <img src="https://cdn.forexoverflow.io/images/1690618298867-fzk00gj558xv395-istockphoto-168581340-1024x1024-transformed-1.jpeg"> <h2>Petrochemicals Margin Struggles</h2> In recent days, Exxon Mobil Corp. (NYSE: XOM) and Chevron Corp. (NYSE: CVX) have been in the news for the prospect of a decline in profits mainly due to lower gasoline and oil prices compared to previous years. The 2nd quarter of 2023 is expected to be an enormous setback to Exxon and Chevron, with profits per share (EPS) predicted to decrease by a whopping 50.4 percent in the range of $2.04 from $4.14 during the second period in 2022. Revenues for the company are expected to decrease by 31.8 percentage points year over year, dropping by $115.68 billion up to $78.85 billion due to the lower natural gas prices and crude refining margins. Chevron's current situation could be better as it is expecting a 50 percent reduction in its earnings during the second quarter compared to its previous year. Chevron's initial results indicate a profit of $6 billion in the second quarter. This is an approximate 48.3 percent decline. However, it is better than Wall Street's estimates for $5.5 billion. But the problems facing Big Oil extend beyond fluctuating gasoline and oil prices. Their investment in key business areas like petrochemicals needs to show more. A glut of chemicals as well as low consumer demand with the opening of a number of new manufacturing facilities in the last few times have led to an ongoing decline in the profits from petrochemicals. The current situation is enough of a problem that the company based in Cologne Lanxness AG has likened it to a "Lehman 2" moment for the chemical business. <h2>Petrochemicals as Growth Engine</h2> Since the beginning of time, Big Oil has heavily depended on petrochemicals as the engine of growth. They use to hedge against gas and oil price fluctuations and as a development driver as we move to clean energy. Wall Street analysts have predicted that oil consumption will increase over the next decade, mostly due to the rising demand for petrochemicals. The previous year it was reported that The Energy Intelligence Group projected that worldwide demand for oil would continue to increase by 1.5 million barrels of oil per day (mb/d) by 2023 and with China being the biggest contributor, contributing 650,000 barrels per day after relaxing its zero-Covid policies. The average demand for oil this year will surpass the record of 100.6 millibars/day set in the year 2019, and it is expected to keep expanding, averaging 106 mb/d by the year 2030. Notably, this increase is mostly driven by increasing demand for petrochemicals that transportation fuels. The Energy Intelligence Group's baseline scenario is that there will be a plateau, not a drop. The optimistic forecast is echoed by more than 10 organizations, including OPEC, Exxon Mobil, and the Energy Information Administration (EIA), and all of them predict an increase in the global demand for oil within the next couple of years. <h2>Petrochemical Overkill</h2> However, Big Oil companies have taken a risk in the use of petrochemicals in order to protect against gas and oil bets. S&amp;P Global reports an astonishing 49.5 million tons of fresh capacity for ethylene that is either in operation or set to go in 2020 or 2024. This is more than the projected demand by nearly 55 percent. More than half of the new capacity is from China in the context of how China seeks to decrease the imports of essential chemicals for the manufacturing sector, which is its biggest. <h2>Embracing New Energy Technologies</h2> Despite the difficulties faced by the industry of petrochemicals, hopes are not gone in the eyes of Big Oil investors. The companies have turned their attention towards promising "New Energy' techniques, such as the renewable energy sector and carbon capture, use as well as storage (CCUS). Carbon capture is a method designed to slow global warming and combat climate change's effects. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and International Energy Agency (IEA) view carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) as an ideal solution for challenging-to-decarbonize sectors, such as aviation, hydrogen production, and cement production from fossil fuels. The big Oil companies have started making major investments in CCUS. For example, Exxon Mobil recently agreed to a long-term deal with the industrial gas firm Linde Plc. (NYSE: LIN) to eliminate carbon dioxide resulting from Linde's clean hydrogen plan located in Beaumont, Texas. Exxon will be able to transport and conserve up to 2.2 million tonnes of carbon dioxide released from Linde's production facility each year. Furthermore, Linde's personal plans call for the construction of the $1.8 billion project that will feature auto thermal reforming that includes carbon capture as well as a massive air separation plant that will provide the cleanest hydrogen as well as nitrogen. Exxon's chief executive, Darren Woods, has stated that he is confident that Exxon's Low Carbon business can surpass its traditional petroleum and gas division in the next ten years and generate significant revenue. In a bid to not be left out Exxon's peer in the oilfield service industry Schlumberger Ltd. (NYSE: SLB) has created Schlumberger Ltd. (NYSE: SLB) has established the SLB New Energy unit, which is investing in five niches comprising hydrogen, carbon solutions, geo-energy, geothermal energy storage as well as crucial minerals. Each of the five niches has a 10 billion market that can be tapped. Schlumberger has big plans for its upcoming business CEO Rennick expects revenues of 3 billion by the close of this decade and a minimum of 10 billion by the year 2030. In a world where the energy sector is constantly evolving, Big Oil's shift to embrace new technologies for energy could be a path toward future growth in spite of the challenges faced by the industry of petrochemicals. The ability to adapt and adapt to the demands ever-changing demands will decide the longevity and ability to compete within a constantly changing world.

istockphoto-1408907723-1024x1024-transformed (1) (1).jpeg

Big Oil's Pursuit of Petrochemicals Falls Short. Learn How Oil Companies' Ambitions to Diversify into Petrochemicals Have Met Challenges and What This Means for Their Long-Term Business Plans.

Big Oil's Petrochemical Disappointment

Big Oil's Gamble on Petrochemicals: A Disappointing Outcome

**Market Capitalization**, commonly referred to as market cap, is a vital metric used to assess the size and value of a publicly traded company. It represents the total market value of a company's outstanding shares of stock. By understanding the different types of market capitalization, investors and analysts can gain valuable insights into the scale and characteristics of various companies. In this article, we will explore the five primary types of market capitalization and discuss their significance in the financial markets.

**Mega-Cap: -**
Mega-cap companies are the largest in terms of market capitalization. These corporations have an extraordinary market value, typically exceeding $200 billion. Mega-cap stocks are known for their size, stability, and global presence. They are often industry leaders with established market dominance. These companies tend to have diverse revenue streams and significant market influence. Investors are attracted to mega-cap stocks for their potential for long-term growth and relatively lower volatility. Examples of mega-cap companies include Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, and Alphabet (Google).

**Large-Cap: -**
Large-cap companies, while not as large as mega-cap companies, still have substantial market capitalization. They generally have market values between $10 billion and $200 billion. Large-cap stocks are considered relatively stable and less volatile compared to mid-cap and small-cap stocks. These companies often have established market positions, strong brand recognition, and solid financial performance. Investors seeking a balance between stability and potential growth often include large-cap stocks in their portfolios. Well-known large-cap companies include Coca-Cola, Procter & Gamble, Walmart, and Visa.

**Mid-Cap: -**

Mid-cap companies fall in the middle range of market capitalization. They typically have market values between $2 billion and $10 billion. These companies are often in a phase of expansion and growth, seeking to capture new market opportunities. Mid-cap stocks offer a balance between stability and growth potential. While they may not have the same level of global recognition as mega-cap or large-cap companies, mid-cap companies can provide investors with attractive investment opportunities. Examples of mid-cap companies include Etsy, Square, Lyft, and Zscaler.

**Small-Cap: -**

Small-cap companies have relatively smaller market capitalization compared to large-cap and mid-cap companies. They generally have market values between $300 million and $2 billion. Small-cap stocks are often associated with higher growth potential and higher risk. These companies are typically in the early stages of development, with significant room for expansion. Small-cap stocks can be more volatile and sensitive to market conditions compared to larger companies. However, successful investments in small-cap stocks can yield substantial returns. Examples of small-cap companies include Carvana, DermTech, Arcimoto, and CalAmp.

**Micro-Cap: -**

Micro-cap companies have the smallest market capitalization among publicly traded companies. They often have market values below $300 million. Micro-cap stocks are typically characterized by their relatively low liquidity and limited analyst coverage. These companies are at an early stage of development and may face significant challenges in terms of funding and market recognition. Investing in micro-cap stocks carries higher risks but can also offer substantial growth opportunities for investors with a high-risk tolerance. Examples of micro-cap companies include Iterum Therapeutics, Electromed, Rekor Systems, and Naked Brand Group.

**Penny Stock Companies: -**

The market capitalization of penny stock companies can vary significantly. Since penny stocks are typically associated with smaller and less-established companies, their market capitalization tends to be relatively low. It is important to note that penny stocks are often considered high-risk investments due to the potential for increased volatility and limited liquidity.

Penny stock companies can fall into different market capitalization categories, including small-cap, micro-cap, and even nano-cap. These categories denote the size of the company and its overall market value. While there is no strict rule for defining penny stock market capitalizations, it is common for these companies to have market values ranging from a few million dollars to a few hundred million dollars.

Investing in penny stocks can be highly speculative and carries a higher level of risk compared to investing in more established companies. Penny stocks are often subject to price manipulation, low trading volumes, and limited information available to investors. It is crucial for investors interested in penny stocks to conduct thorough research, including analyzing the company's financial health, management team, industry trends, and potential risks.

Due to their low share prices and the potential for significant price fluctuations, penny stocks can be appealing to traders and speculative investors looking for short-term opportunities. However, it is important to approach penny stock investing with caution and to diversify one's investment portfolio to mitigate risk.

**Conclusion**

Understanding the different types of market capitalization provides investors with valuable insights into the size, stability, growth potential, and risk associated with various companies. Mega-cap and large-cap stocks offer stability and market dominance, mid-cap stocks provide a balance between stability and growth, small-cap stocks present higher growth potential with increased risk, and micro-cap stocks offer significant growth opportunities with higher risk and it also be high risk in penny stock companies when the investor on it  and these stocks are not trusted and the investor may affected. To invest in any type of these market capitalization companies the investor should understand the financial, technical and fundaments of the company and more to learn or understand the fundamentals of any stocks you get more benefits or either when constructing an investment portfolio, investors should consider their risk tolerance, investment.

**Market Capitalization**, commonly referred to as market cap, is a vital metric used to assess the size and value of a publicly traded company. It represents the total market value of a company's out...

Exploring the Different Types of Market Capitalization

In the dynamic world of **Corporate Finance**, the capital structure plays a crucial role in determining the financial health and success of a company. It encompasses the composition of different types of capital, such as equity and debt, utilized by a corporation to finance its operations, investments, and growth initiatives. Understanding the various types of capital structure options available to corporations is essential for optimizing financial performance and achieving sustainable growth. In this comprehensive guide, we will delve into the different types of capital structure, provide illustrative examples, and explore strategies to help corporations make informed decisions to outrank their competitors and thrive in the market.

**Equity Capital: -**
Equity capital represents ownership in a corporation and is derived from the issuance and sale of common or preferred stock. Shareholders who invest in equity capital become part-owners of the company, providing them with certain rights and privileges, such as voting rights and a share of profits through dividends. Equity capital is considered a long-term source of funding and does not require regular interest payments or fixed repayment obligations. Examples of equity capital include initial public offerings (IPOs), private placements, and venture capital investments.

**Debt Capital: -**
Debt capital refers to funds raised by a corporation through borrowing, typically in the form of loans, bonds, or other debt instruments. Unlike equity capital, debt capital imposes a legal obligation on the corporation to repay the borrowed amount, along with interest, within a specified period. Debt holders, also known as creditors, do not have ownership rights but are entitled to regular interest payments and the return of principal at maturity. Examples of debt capital include bank loans, corporate bonds, and convertible debt securities.

**Mezzanine Financing: -**
Mezzanine financing represents a hybrid form of capital structure that combines elements of both equity and debt. It is often utilized by corporations to bridge the gap between senior debt and equity capital. Mezzanine financing can take various forms, including subordinated debt, preferred equity, or convertible debt securities. This type of capital structure offers higher returns to investors compared to traditional debt, as it carries greater risk. Mezzanine financing is commonly used to support acquisitions, expansion projects, and management buyouts.

Hybrid Capital:
Hybrid capital is a blend of different types of capital, designed to meet specific financing needs and optimize capital structure efficiency. It combines elements of both equity and debt, offering flexibility and customization. Examples of hybrid capital include convertible bonds, preference shares, and equity-linked notes. Hybrid capital instruments often feature characteristics such as fixed interest payments for a specific period, convertible options, or equity-like participation. They allow corporations to balance the advantages of both equity and debt capital while aligning with their financial goals.

**Optimal Capital Structure Strategies: -**
Determining the optimal capital structure for a corporation requires a comprehensive analysis of various factors, including industry dynamics, business risk, cash flow generation, and investor preferences. Although there is no one-size-fits-all approach, corporations can adopt several strategies to achieve an optimal capital structure:

**a. Balance Risk and Return: -**
Corporations should aim to strike a balance between risk and return when structuring their capital. Analyzing the risk profile of the business, industry benchmarks, and investor expectations helps in determining the appropriate mix of equity and debt.

**b. Maintain Financial Flexibility: -**
Flexibility is key in responding to changing market conditions and unforeseen challenges. Corporations should ensure they have access to adequate liquidity and financial resources to support their ongoing operations and growth initiatives.

**c. Consider Tax Implications: -**
The tax deductibility of interest payments on debt makes it an attractive financing option for corporations. Evaluating the tax implications of different types of capital structure can help optimize tax benefits and minimize the overall cost of capital.

**d. Regularly Assess Capital Structure: -**
The financial landscape is constantly evolving, and corporations should regularly reassess their capital structure to adapt to changing market dynamics and investor preferences. Conducting periodic reviews helps in identifying opportunities for optimization and ensuring alignment with strategic objectives.

By understanding the various types of capital structure and implementing effective strategies, corporations can enhance their financial performance, attract investors, and gain a competitive edge in the market. Achieving an optimal capital structure requires careful analysis, considering the unique characteristics and goals of the corporation.


In the dynamic world of **Corporate Finance**, the capital structure plays a crucial role in determining the financial health and success of a company. It encompasses the composition of different type...

Types of Capital Structure in Corporation: Exploring Examples and Strategies

Here are some potential effects:

Inflation: As oil is a crucial input for most economic activities, an increase in its price can lead to higher production costs, which can result in inflationary pressures on consumer prices.

Reduced consumer spending: As fuel prices rise, consumers may have less disposable income to spend on other goods and services, leading to a reduction in overall consumer spending. This can have a negative impact on economic growth.

Impact on trade balances: Countries that are net oil importers may experience a deterioration in their trade balances as they spend more on oil imports. Conversely, oil-exporting nations may benefit from higher prices, leading to improved trade balances and increased government revenues.

Impact on stock markets: The stock prices of companies that are highly dependent on oil, such as airlines and transportation companies, may fall as their costs increase. Conversely, the stock prices of energy companies may rise as they benefit from higher prices.

Impact on government finances: Higher oil prices can lead to increased tax revenues for governments that tax oil production or consumption. However, if prices rise too high, it can also lead to increased social spending and subsidies to help mitigate the impact on consumers.

Overall, rising oil prices can have a significant impact on the global economy, and the extent of this impact will depend on various factors such as the magnitude and duration of the price increase, as well as the economic policies and responses of different countries.

Here are some potential effects:

Inflation: As oil is a crucial input for most economic activities, an increase in its price can lead to higher production costs, which can result in inflationary pres...

Rising oil prices can have various impacts on the global economy.

In recent years, many giant companies such as Google, Amazon, Facebook, and Microsoft have been in the headlines for laying off employees. These layoffs have come as a shock to many people, as these companies are often seen as stable and prosperous organizations that offer their employees job security and great benefits. So why are these companies laying off employees? In this article, we will take a closer look at some of the reasons why giant companies are laying off employees and what this means for the workforce as a whole.

**1-	Changing Market Conditions**

One of the main reasons why giant companies are laying off employees is due to changing market conditions. In today's fast-paced business world, companies must continually adapt to stay ahead of the competition. This means that sometimes companies need to make tough decisions, such as laying off employees, to cut costs and remain competitive.

For example, in the case of Google, the company laid off around 1,200 employees in early 2020 due to a decline in advertising revenue caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Similarly, Amazon laid off hundreds of employees in 2018 as it shifted its focus from its retail business to its cloud computing division.

**2-	Automation and Technology**

Another reason why giant companies are laying off employees is due to the increasing use of automation and technology. As technology continues to advance, many companies are finding that they can replace human workers with machines and algorithms that can perform the same tasks more efficiently and at a lower cost.
For example, in 2019, Amazon announced that it was planning to spend $700 million to retrain one-third of its workforce to perform more technical jobs, such as software engineering and data analytics. This move was seen as a way for Amazon to stay ahead of the curve and to ensure that its workforce was equipped with the skills needed to succeed in the age of automation.

**3-	Restructuring and Reorganization**

Another reason why giant companies are laying off employees is due to restructuring and reorganization. As companies grow and evolve, they often need to restructure their operations to remain competitive and efficient. This can involve consolidating departments, eliminating redundant positions, and shifting job responsibilities.
For example, in 2017, Microsoft announced that it was laying off thousands of employees as part of a major restructuring effort aimed at streamlining its operations and focusing on its cloud computing business. Similarly, Facebook has undergone several reorganizations in recent years, which have led to layoffs in certain departments.

**4-	Economic Downturns**

Finally, giant companies may lay off employees during economic downturns. When the economy takes a downturn, companies may experience a decline in sales or revenue, which can lead to budget cuts and layoffs.
For example, during the 2008 financial crisis, many companies were forced to lay off employees as they struggled to stay afloat. In the case of Google, the company laid off around 100 recruiters in 2008 due to a decline in hiring caused by the economic downturn.

**5-	Merger and Acquisition**

Another reason why giant companies lay off employees is due to the merger and acquisition of other companies. In many cases, when a company acquires another company, there is often a duplication of roles or responsibilities, and this can lead to layoffs.

For example, in 2016, Microsoft acquired LinkedIn, a professional networking platform. As part of the acquisition, Microsoft announced that it would be laying off around 5,500 employees to eliminate overlapping roles and to streamline operations.

**6-	Cost-cutting Measures**

Sometimes, giant companies lay off employees as a cost-cutting measure. When a company is looking to cut costs, it may turn to layoffs as a way to reduce expenses and to improve profitability.
For example, in 2019, Uber laid off around 1,200 employees as part of a cost-cutting measure aimed at improving its financial performance. Similarly, in 2014, IBM announced that it would be laying off around 15,000 employees as part of a cost-cutting initiative.

**7-	Strategic Shifts**

Finally, giant companies may lay off employees as part of a strategic shift in their business model or focus. As companies evolve and change, they may need to shift their focus to new products or services, which can require a different set of skills or expertise.

For example, in 2019, Intel announced that it was planning to lay off around 12,000 employees as part of a strategic shift away from its traditional business of manufacturing computer chips and towards new areas such as data centers and the Internet of Things.

**Conclusion**

In conclusion, there are many reasons why giant companies lay off employees, and these reasons can vary depending on the company and the industry in which it operates. While layoffs can be painful for employees and their families, they are often necessary for companies to remain competitive and to adapt to changing market conditions, technological advances, and shifts in the economy.

As the workforce continues to evolve, it is important for employees to stay adaptable and to develop new skills that will help them succeed in the age of automation and technology. It is also important for companies to be transparent and to communicate openly with their employees about any changes or challenges that may arise.
In summary, while layoffs can be difficult and disruptive, they are often a necessary part of the business world, and companies must take steps to ensure that they are managing them in a responsible and ethical manner.


In recent years, many giant companies such as Google, Amazon, Facebook, and Microsoft have been in the headlines for laying off employees. These layoffs have come as a shock to many people, as these c...

Newest & Recent

Find the lastest update

Popular of the day

Most watched posts

Forex Glossary

A to Z Forex abbreviations

Daily Analysis

Industry Experts posts

Pinned Tags

#trade360

#finexo

#fxtrading.com

#sky alliance markets

#amega

#ospreyfx

#fxglory

#fibo group

#ig global

#bdswiss

#lcg

#fxgrow

#legacyfx

#superforex

#simplefx

#rakuten securities

#ifc markets

#triumphfx

#world forex

#amana capital

companies

5 articles published related to#companies

Big Oil's Gamble on Petrochemicals: A Disappointing Outcome

Exploring the Different Types of Market Capitalization

Types of Capital Structure in Corporation: Exploring Example...

Rising oil prices can have various impacts on the global eco...

Why Are Giant Companies Laying Off Employees?

Daily Analysis

Geo Politics